Wednesday, July 26, 2006


Most people who are even remotely acquainted with the nature of combat understand that "collateral casualties" are at times unavoidable, and a fact of any conflict.

Still, if this is true, then it represents something worse than a simple battlefield error.

So what is Harper going to say about this? Is this part of the "measured response?" Is this justifiable?

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home