Friday, May 20, 2011
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Thursday, May 12, 2011
Tories back off campaign pledge to show a surplus by 2014-15
Edit: Hey, good for the Tories on deciding to make good on their promise.
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
How about, instead of saying "baggage," you give some details?
Political mythmaking, Ontario style
By Tim Armstrong The Hamilton Spectator (Aug 14, 2006)
The drumbeat theme of those opposing Bob Rae's Liberal leadership candidacy is, "A smart guy, with a terrible record as premier of Ontario." It's difficult to fathom whether this myth is the product of ignorance, malice, or both.
I was appointed as a Deputy Minister by Premier Davis and served under him and his three successors, Premiers Peterson, Miller and Rae. None of those premiers would claim to have achieved perfection. But the suggestion that the Rae government did not live up to -- and in some areas exceed -- the standards and accomplishments of its predecessors on behalf of the people of Ontario is untrue.
When Bob Rae assumed office, the province was faced with an economic crisis -- a deepening recession, unprecedented competitive challenges from a Free Trade Agreement with the U.S., high interest rates, an overvalued dollar and a budget deficit of several billion dollars rather than the surplus predicted by the prior administration. Over 300,000 manufacturing jobs were lost between 1989 and 1992.
When the Rae government approached the end of its term, Ontario led the way in growth among the provinces and had one of the strongest economies in the G7. Surveys showed strong consumer and business confidence.
Private sector investment was back with billions in capital spending. Labour productivity was at an all-time high, as were manufacturing exports. Health-care costs were under much improved control as part of a broader strategy that was reducing the deficit.
My most memorable work with Premier Rae involved the restructuring of Algoma Steel in Sudbury and Dehavilland Aircraft in Downsview. From the outset, the premier made it clear that he was determined, in the interests of the employees, the affected communities, and the provincial economy, that both companies would survive. His personal efforts in achieving success exceeded, in dedication, intelligence and shrewd negotiating skills, anything that I had previously experienced.
The costs incurred by Ontario in these restructurings, as well as those extracted from the federal government, have been recovered, many times over, in tax revenues alone. And the dismal alternatives to success -- weeds in the companies' parking lots, padlocks on their gates, and thousands of discouraged unemployed workers, their families on welfare or seeking social assistance -- were all avoided. These achievements were repeated, at Spruce Falls Pulp & Paper in Kapuskasing and other communities across the province, under the Manufacturing Recovery Program, a program designed and implemented with the full involvement of the Premier.
Bob Rae was, from the outset, under attack from many in the business community. After taking office, he faced vigorous opposition from organized labour, principally for his efforts to curtail what he perceived to be excessive wage demands and his commitment to share the necessary cuts in government spending fairly. In my experience in the labour relations field, if you displease both labour and management, you are likely on the right path.
There were other noteworthy achievements during this time. The Rae government successfully promoted the Jobs Ontario program, with increased investment in child care and training; incentives to employers to hire people on welfare and those whose employment insurance had run out; the elimination of payroll taxes on any new employee hired -- policies that, combined, created in excess of 50,000 jobs.
Ontario's welfare system was renewed, focusing on the needs of children living in poverty; the child-care budget was expanded; hundreds of thousands of poor families were removed from income tax rolls; and the new Trillium Drug Plan gave affordable access to all in need of therapeutic drugs.
The Rae government placed a renewed emphasis on aboriginal affairs, leading to the first Statement of Political Relationship between a provincial government and aboriginal leadership, acknowledging the need for government-to-government relations and providing new funding to address native poverty, with emphasis on housing, child care and improved sewer and water facilities.
Finally, as premier, Bob Rae held a deep commitment to the success of our federal system, and in particular, one that would accommodate Quebec's goals and aspirations, without jeopardizing Canadian national unity. He played a leadership role with the First Ministers that produced an affirmative vote in Ontario on the national referendum on the Charlottetown Accord.
Many other reforms were set in motion, many of which have been continued by successive governments. As to the Liberal leadership race, may the best candidate win. But in the process, the trumped-up myth that Bob Rae presided over an ineffective government needs to be put to rest.
Tim Armstrong was Ontario's Deputy Minister of Labour and Deputy Minister of Industry, Trade and Technology and was the province's Agent General for the Asia- Pacific region, 1986-1990.
Wednesday, May 04, 2011
Quick Quiz: Rebuilding the Party
A) 6-12 months, if we push it and find the right leader.
B) 2-4 years, to make sure we are ready to regain power after the next election
C) 8-1O years, if we're lucky.
I think part of the cause of the party's recent setback has been too many people choosing A) or B) after the last couple of election losses.
The result? Option C) may be the new default.
One aspect of this that I think has been missed all around is that it takes time for leaders to make an impression, and more than just a couple years for Canadians to get to know them and warm up to them. Like it or not, we have to resolve to stick with our next leader for a long haul, perhaps even after an election loss (*gasp!*).
Another factor in the NDP and Conservatives success is that their respective leaders have been around long enough for people, average voters who aren't hard wired into politics, to get to know them and get comfortable with them. Unfortunately, Stephane Dion and Michael Ignatieff were never given this opportunity, so we'll never know how well they could have eventually done. We shouldn't make this mistake again, tempting as it is to try to find someone who will resonate with voters and enjoy a greater immediate success (has this ever happened?)
A few cents more
One of the things that has been gradually helping the Conservatives towards this majority has been their own creep towards the centre of the Canadian political spectrum, where they will have to govern from if they want to solidify their gains. This is a transformation that has had to happen gradually, to avoid over straining the "stretch" that party is experiencing (this will become evident as Ontario and Toronto makes it's way back into the fold, and Alberta begins to wonder wtf they were thinking).
Stephen Harper's appeal to right-leaning Liberal voters was not an off-the-cuff remark. This was a focused tactic, a strategy which was geared toward pulling in more of the centrist vote, and it worked. This echoed Jack Layton's own "Lend us your votes" strategy from a few elections ago where the NDP pulled in the other direction; only the Liberal party could be targeted in this way (from opposite directions).
Tuesday, May 03, 2011
I've read another account that says that we were too close to the NDP on the left, and seemed to suggest, a disingenuous version of them which failed in the face of their perceived sincerity over ours regarding those positions which we shared.
Perhaps, just maybe, what we are seeing is more of a polarization of Canadian politics, moving slightly away from that centre ground that we have done so well to occupy in the past.
In such a scenario, you would see more of the kind of results that materialized for the Conservatives and the NDP.
Another silver lining